https://ift.tt/3ncwFEC via /r/science https://ift.tt/3h6GH6x

https://ift.tt/3h4JHR4 via /r/woahdude https://ift.tt/3n6BNdu

https://ift.tt/2Vg23qi via /r/gifs https://ift.tt/38J0bJO

https://ift.tt/2Vkls9O via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/38CICLs

https://ift.tt/3yFAa8E via /r/TheWayWeWere https://ift.tt/3yIXOBk

https://ift.tt/38BLcRZ via /r/plants https://ift.tt/3t9XVEV

https://ift.tt/3tcqL7z via /r/plantclinic https://ift.tt/2Yoel1d

https://ift.tt/3t2TL1H, the French language version of the CBC, published an explosive investigative story here on March 26, 2020, as part of its Enquête series, where five realtors in Montréal each independently agreed to take proceeds of crime derived from Colombian narcotics activities from a buyer from Panama with a criminal record, on a hidden camera, and to obfuscate the transaction in the name of the buyer’s girlfriend, a 20-year-old unemployed student.In the report, available on YouTube (here), Radio-Canada explains that the buyer and the girlfriend are actors. They agreed to wear a hidden camera and microphone and, with the Radio-Canada producer, to meet with realtors in Montréal to view properties that ranged from $1.4 million to $7 million.One of the actor’s task was to disclose to the realtors that he had a criminal record from narcotics activities in Colombia; that he had quite a lot of money from narcotics activities that was moved from Panama to the Bahamas (both money laundering havens) and kept out of Canada.After disclosing his narcotics activities in Colombia, keeping money out of Canada and his criminal record, the second task of the actor was to see if the realtors would facilitate him buying millions of dollars in real estate with proceeds of crime without providing any ID, and if they would agree to put the real estate in the name of his unemployed girlfriend.Amazing reporting and shocking result – every realtor agreed to take proceeds of crime from Panama from a person with a criminal record and who was anonymous, and to keep the buyer’s name off any paperwork, and to register real title in a multi-million dollar property in the name of an unemployed third party.Some of the exchanges between the realtors and the buyer are as follows (translated by us):Buyer: “Are you capable of keeping a secret?”Realtor: “Yes.”Buyer: “Money is not an object for me, ok? The 1990s were golden years for me. I made lots of money. With, ah, Colombia. You follow?”Realtor: “Yes.”Buyer: “I was involved quite a lot in narcotics in the 1990s – I operated in the narcotics world quite a lot and I accumulated quite a lot of money that is, of course, outside of Canada. I was arrested for that. I had to do a bit of time. My money derives from that. I placed it in Panama. Then in the Bahamas.”Realtor: “Ok.“Yes, the realtor says “ok” after learning the guy did time for narcotics activities involving Colombia and parked the money outside of Canada.And there’s more exchanges with other realtors, as follows:Buyer: “You comprehend well that my money comes from drugs; we understand each other eh? And I don’t want anything to show up in Canada; my name appears nowhere in any transaction.”Realtor: “That doesn’t bother me at all.”Buyer: “That does not bother you at all?”Realtor: (Laughs) “My best friend’s husband does the same thing.”Buyer: “We understand each other.”Realtor: “We understand each other**.”**In Enquête, the buyer tells realtors that his girlfriend will buy the real estate through a private company and he will not give his ID. They tell him that’s ok.One realtor promises absolute discretion and says “I’ll even shake on it.” Another realtor suggests that they refrain from using email.One realtor says that in his eyes (meaning in his view), the buyer was not the buyer; the unemployed girlfriend was.Another two exchanges between the fictitious narcotics criminal from Panama and realtors were as follows:Buyer: “If you ask me for ID papers, you won’t get them.”Realtor: “Perfect.”Buyer: “That’s clear.”Realtor: “I won’t even ask you then.”Buyer: “You never saw me.”Realtor: “That’s it.”Buyer: “I don’t exist.”Realtor: “That’s it.”Another realtor:“I have zero problem with that. Absolutely zero problem. Zero. … no, no, no, no, zero problem with that.”Two different realtors, after hearing that the money was from narcotics activities from Colombia and that it had been placed in Panama and then in the Bahamas said it was not for them to judge.Wait what?Actually, it is for the realtors to judge.The Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act requires that realtors determine if there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a completed or an attempted financial transaction is tied to a predicate offence, which is a subjective determination and hence the realtor must make a judgment call. IOW, the realtor’s job is to judge the transaction’s likelihood to be connected to one of many predicate offences in Canada. There were at least three serious predicate offences staring the realtors in the face – tax evasion, money laundering and drug trafficking.It was snowing in Montreal during the real estate meetings and thus one exchange ends with the buyer, hitting home that he was in the cocaine business in Colombia, saying:Buyer: “The snow … I prefer to see it on a table. Not on the asphalt.”Realtor laughs.Radio-Canada called the realtors a week later and four of the five denied ever having been involved in a situation where a person sought to launder money through them.Some realtors said that they believed that their anti-money laundering and Criminal Code of Canada obligations arose only when there was a real estate offer from the buyer.The realtors, however, had an obligation to obtain, verify and record the identity of the buyer and the third party (the girlfriend) when they became clients, and to report the attempted financial transaction as a suspicious transaction to FINTRAC. There is no law that allows a reporting entity or its employees to obfuscate the parties in a transaction, or ignore third party ID measures. Then there is the issue of knowingly accepting proceeds of crime which is a criminal offence.The Enquête episode in French is below. It ends with commentary about the role of lawyers who practice in the area of real estate law and mentions the concerns with the exemption of lawyers as reporting entities in Canada and the fact that law enforcement has no visibility over the financial transactions of lawyers who have trust accounts.You may be wondering “just how bad are things in Canada when it comes to compliance with the proceeds of crime legislation?”Well, remember the first exchange where the narcotics criminal says “can you keep a secret?” and the realtor says “yes”? The whole of the proceeds of crime legislation in Canada, literally the whole of it, is to not keep a secret.Enquête | Émission spéciale sur l’immobilier:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOgwMuzYvfs via /r/canadahousing https://ift.tt/3jALor6

https://ift.tt/2V8tbYq via /r/pics https://ift.tt/2WIWscT

https://ift.tt/38sIbDz via /r/todayilearned https://ift.tt/3gSliOm

https://ift.tt/3kKAiiw via /r/Damnthatsinteresting https://ift.tt/3yujSj6

https://ift.tt/3gVRT5P via /r/Damnthatsinteresting https://ift.tt/2V8nJEV

https://ift.tt/3kLZfdh via /r/BeAmazed https://ift.tt/3kPw9cY

https://ift.tt/3zvF8Gt via /r/interestingasfuck https://ift.tt/3kHkMUy

https://ift.tt/3t5H9H0 via /r/news https://ift.tt/3tiLQ0p

https://ift.tt/3kJb1Fd via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3kMW7hl

https://ift.tt/3jAAlxO via /r/interestingasfuck https://ift.tt/38yVYZe

“I have a foreboding of an America in my children’s or grandchildren’s time — when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what’s true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness…The dumbing down of American is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30 second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance”Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the DarkThis book written in 1995 by Carl and his wife Ann Druyan almost seems like a prediction of the times we are living in today. What I appreciate about Ann and Carl is that they break down complex subjects into simple terms so that the layman can understand. The issues they talk about couldn’t be more important and needs to be understood by everyone.I really wish this was a book they required in the schools to read. Everyone needs to have a healthy level of skepticism in the age of information where anything and everything is being posted online, even here on Reddit.Every book by Carl has been its own gem and an eye opener to the universe and world we live on. Cosmos, Pale Blue Dot, or even his work of fiction Contact is truly spectacular.Many of you have heard of Carl Sagan already but if you have not taken the time to read his work I highly recommend you start with this book. via /r/books https://ift.tt/2YipSPx

https://ift.tt/3BzEw3m via /r/NatureIsFuckingLit https://ift.tt/2V8vPgN

https://ift.tt/3zEjr7h via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3zD14j9

https://ift.tt/2WHI70c via /r/todayilearned https://ift.tt/3DEpGuc

https://ift.tt/3t6uoMc via /r/houseplants https://ift.tt/2Va0PwX

https://ift.tt/2WK2KII via /r/science https://ift.tt/3mLNkim

https://ift.tt/3kMRKCO via /r/todayilearned https://ift.tt/2Y8ylEK

https://ift.tt/2WEjPEE via /r/Damnthatsinteresting https://ift.tt/3gTw074

https://ift.tt/3t5ONRL via /r/interestingasfuck https://ift.tt/3gPef9i

https://ift.tt/2WER7Dc via /r/todayilearned https://ift.tt/2WNeH0G

https://ift.tt/3tcMKLF via /r/ProgrammerHumor https://ift.tt/3yBTfZF

Our water bill has always been ~$300 every two months ever since moving in two years ago. That should have been a huge red flag to me but truthfully I just set up the account and enabled automatic payments and didn’t bother checking. We’re immigrants and just assumed that was a normal water bill here in Ontario, Canada.Well we just got our latest bill and it’s for about $450. Obviously this struck me as odd so I went digging. Since we have a smart meter it reports usage every hour, and this can be aggregated to daily, monthly, etc. I can see that half way through July our usage shot up and stayed that way since then. This screamed leak to me, so I went hunting around the house for the culprit. Eventually after lifting the lid on all the toilet cisterns I found that the downstairs toilet is leaking. It will drain about 2 inches of water and then refill itself, over and over again, constantly. It’s a bad rubber flapper. It has deteriorated and caused a significant leak. It’s a very quiet toilet and we weren’t exactly listening out for it constantly refilling the tank, and we really don’t use it all that much, so we never noticed. I thought “I’ll just get a new flapper, they’re $10 from Home Depot, it sucks that we paid $150 extra for water but shit happens”.That got me thinking about our regular bill… $300 seems high, no? So I Googled. Reddit threads said people’s average bills were like $100, $150 max. Oh shit. I went and looked at our usage again from last year, way before this leak happened. I looked at the hourly usage. We were using almost exactly the same amount of water during the night hours (12am-7am) than we were in the afternoon hours when a shower/dishwasher/washing machine etc wasn’t running. FUCK! This leak has been costing us for YEARS. Only a month and a half ago did it deteriorate to the point of being noticeable. Our water has had a baseline level of usage, every hour around the clock, for two years just from this one leak.So I figure with the amount we were paying for water over the average for a 2 bedroom household, over a 2 year period, this $10 toilet part has cost us thousands of dollars in excess water use that we just never noticed.Not really sure why I’m posting this, except I think I need to laugh at it as a coping mechanism, and I figure a subreddit for the financially conscious would appreciate a laugh and somebody new to be the butt of the jokes.The engineer in me is now wondering why water companies don’t monitor for a very steady baseline level of usage, especially through the night hours, and send a polite letter or email warning the home owner there might be a leak… I’m sure it’s not in their best interest to sell less of what makes them money, but this is a huge waste of water. via /r/PersonalFinanceCanada https://ift.tt/3BB8unk

https://ift.tt/3zvSOkK via /r/TheWayWeWere https://ift.tt/2V3C1qb

No text found via /r/quotes https://ift.tt/3jDWP1f

https://ift.tt/3Bx7UqI via /r/interestingasfuck https://ift.tt/3yK7oUN

No text found via /r/bookquotes https://ift.tt/3DvTo4x

https://ift.tt/38svHvy via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3gRXRVs

No text found via /r/quotes https://ift.tt/3DxqaCd

https://ift.tt/3DBuKiV via /r/TheWayWeWere https://ift.tt/3jv1C4S

https://ift.tt/3t2TL1H, the French language version of the CBC, published an explosive investigative story here on March 26, 2020, as part of its Enquête series, where five realtors in Montréal each independently agreed to take proceeds of crime derived from Colombian narcotics activities from a buyer from Panama with a criminal record, on a hidden camera, and to obfuscate the transaction in the name of the buyer’s girlfriend, a 20-year-old unemployed student.In the report, available on YouTube (here), Radio-Canada explains that the buyer and the girlfriend are actors. They agreed to wear a hidden camera and microphone and, with the Radio-Canada producer, to meet with realtors in Montréal to view properties that ranged from $1.4 million to $7 million.One of the actor’s task was to disclose to the realtors that he had a criminal record from narcotics activities in Colombia; that he had quite a lot of money from narcotics activities that was moved from Panama to the Bahamas (both money laundering havens) and kept out of Canada.After disclosing his narcotics activities in Colombia, keeping money out of Canada and his criminal record, the second task of the actor was to see if the realtors would facilitate him buying millions of dollars in real estate with proceeds of crime without providing any ID, and if they would agree to put the real estate in the name of his unemployed girlfriend.Amazing reporting and shocking result – every realtor agreed to take proceeds of crime from Panama from a person with a criminal record and who was anonymous, and to keep the buyer’s name off any paperwork, and to register real title in a multi-million dollar property in the name of an unemployed third party.Some of the exchanges between the realtors and the buyer are as follows (translated by us):Buyer: “Are you capable of keeping a secret?”Realtor: “Yes.”Buyer: “Money is not an object for me, ok? The 1990s were golden years for me. I made lots of money. With, ah, Colombia. You follow?”Realtor: “Yes.”Buyer: “I was involved quite a lot in narcotics in the 1990s – I operated in the narcotics world quite a lot and I accumulated quite a lot of money that is, of course, outside of Canada. I was arrested for that. I had to do a bit of time. My money derives from that. I placed it in Panama. Then in the Bahamas.”Realtor: “Ok.“Yes, the realtor says “ok” after learning the guy did time for narcotics activities involving Colombia and parked the money outside of Canada.And there’s more exchanges with other realtors, as follows:Buyer: “You comprehend well that my money comes from drugs; we understand each other eh? And I don’t want anything to show up in Canada; my name appears nowhere in any transaction.”Realtor: “That doesn’t bother me at all.”Buyer: “That does not bother you at all?”Realtor: (Laughs) “My best friend’s husband does the same thing.”Buyer: “We understand each other.”Realtor: “We understand each other**.”**In Enquête, the buyer tells realtors that his girlfriend will buy the real estate through a private company and he will not give his ID. They tell him that’s ok.One realtor promises absolute discretion and says “I’ll even shake on it.” Another realtor suggests that they refrain from using email.One realtor says that in his eyes (meaning in his view), the buyer was not the buyer; the unemployed girlfriend was.Another two exchanges between the fictitious narcotics criminal from Panama and realtors were as follows:Buyer: “If you ask me for ID papers, you won’t get them.”Realtor: “Perfect.”Buyer: “That’s clear.”Realtor: “I won’t even ask you then.”Buyer: “You never saw me.”Realtor: “That’s it.”Buyer: “I don’t exist.”Realtor: “That’s it.”Another realtor:“I have zero problem with that. Absolutely zero problem. Zero. … no, no, no, no, zero problem with that.”Two different realtors, after hearing that the money was from narcotics activities from Colombia and that it had been placed in Panama and then in the Bahamas said it was not for them to judge.Wait what?Actually, it is for the realtors to judge.The Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act requires that realtors determine if there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a completed or an attempted financial transaction is tied to a predicate offence, which is a subjective determination and hence the realtor must make a judgment call. IOW, the realtor’s job is to judge the transaction’s likelihood to be connected to one of many predicate offences in Canada. There were at least three serious predicate offences staring the realtors in the face – tax evasion, money laundering and drug trafficking.It was snowing in Montreal during the real estate meetings and thus one exchange ends with the buyer, hitting home that he was in the cocaine business in Colombia, saying:Buyer: “The snow … I prefer to see it on a table. Not on the asphalt.”Realtor laughs.Radio-Canada called the realtors a week later and four of the five denied ever having been involved in a situation where a person sought to launder money through them.Some realtors said that they believed that their anti-money laundering and Criminal Code of Canada obligations arose only when there was a real estate offer from the buyer.The realtors, however, had an obligation to obtain, verify and record the identity of the buyer and the third party (the girlfriend) when they became clients, and to report the attempted financial transaction as a suspicious transaction to FINTRAC. There is no law that allows a reporting entity or its employees to obfuscate the parties in a transaction, or ignore third party ID measures. Then there is the issue of knowingly accepting proceeds of crime which is a criminal offence.The Enquête episode in French is below. It ends with commentary about the role of lawyers who practice in the area of real estate law and mentions the concerns with the exemption of lawyers as reporting entities in Canada and the fact that law enforcement has no visibility over the financial transactions of lawyers who have trust accounts.You may be wondering “just how bad are things in Canada when it comes to compliance with the proceeds of crime legislation?”Well, remember the first exchange where the narcotics criminal says “can you keep a secret?” and the realtor says “yes”? The whole of the proceeds of crime legislation in Canada, literally the whole of it, is to not keep a secret.Enquête | Émission spéciale sur l’immobilier:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOgwMuzYvfs via /r/canadahousing https://ift.tt/3jALor6

https://ift.tt/3t4625O via /r/plants https://ift.tt/3BygQMO

https://ift.tt/3BqXk4A via /r/interestingasfuck https://ift.tt/3gRsKtb

https://ift.tt/3kJZbuu via /r/pics https://ift.tt/38uDM32

https://ift.tt/2WDiE83 via /r/TheWayWeWere https://ift.tt/3kAV582

https://ift.tt/2WyG12V via /r/funny https://ift.tt/3mTE4Zt

https://ift.tt/2V4RN49 via /r/interestingasfuck https://ift.tt/3yt1VkY

https://ift.tt/3jxRfxb via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3gM1pZe

https://ift.tt/3zCpR6L via /r/funny https://ift.tt/3Dzh7AB

https://ift.tt/3gKSlnh via /r/DIY https://ift.tt/3yrCEYo

https://ift.tt/3zBh8l8 via /r/Documentaries https://ift.tt/3gPkCta

Just heard from multiple people they got 20%-100% salary increase either by changing jobs or spontaneously from their employers, very recently.What is going on? Is there some news I missed?I checked glassdoor for salary on software developers in Ontario, and the numbers there seems to be only at 60% of what people are actually getting paid recently. I’m sure this trend of increase is recent. via /r/PersonalFinanceCanada https://ift.tt/38pFLFA

https://ift.tt/3koo92r via /r/plantclinic https://ift.tt/3mLjxqb

https://ift.tt/3gxK8TI via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3zl1Vom

https://ift.tt/38uMtdj via /r/interestingasfuck https://ift.tt/2Y8BJzD

https://ift.tt/3kzhzX4 via /r/mildlyinteresting https://ift.tt/2Wz6jl4

https://ift.tt/3mXw9ur via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3BoElHX

https://ift.tt/3mKoLm2 via /r/mildlyinteresting https://ift.tt/3jpW2Az

https://ift.tt/3jpYg35 via /r/TheWayWeWere https://ift.tt/2V0YTGY

https://ift.tt/3DrskmS via /r/plants https://ift.tt/3Dor2cp

https://ift.tt/3ym0eFL via /r/CanadaPolitics https://ift.tt/3BD9jwf

https://ift.tt/3gJGAxE via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/2UXyJEW

https://ift.tt/3gHytBN via /r/TheWayWeWere https://ift.tt/3jqzsb5

https://ift.tt/2WqrJRT via /r/TheWayWeWere https://ift.tt/3ykQxaR

https://ift.tt/3BsrDIl via /r/plants https://ift.tt/3kyfg6r

https://ift.tt/2WAW67y via /r/toronto https://ift.tt/3zqzfKx

https://ift.tt/38jH3SC via /r/houseplants https://ift.tt/3kCnn1Q

https://ift.tt/2Y7Snft via /r/programming https://ift.tt/3sWL1dl

https://ift.tt/3kAHuxk via /r/pics https://ift.tt/2UTpsh5

https://ift.tt/3BmDkjs via /r/BuyItForLife https://ift.tt/2Y4Xgt0

https://ift.tt/2Y7biKE via /r/funny https://ift.tt/3yo5usz

https://ift.tt/2Wz9gCk via /r/houseplants https://ift.tt/3mErUn5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC__o1UxDl8 via /r/videos https://ift.tt/2WyJRsH

https://ift.tt/3kvKbAl via /r/plants https://ift.tt/3mIiUh0

https://ift.tt/2WCifCS via /r/toronto https://ift.tt/2WA2MCU

https://ift.tt/2Wurt3Y via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/38nuVzO

https://ift.tt/3DnTKKm via /r/interestingasfuck https://ift.tt/3BhQNZW

https://ift.tt/3kyAUrp via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3zq3K3c

https://ift.tt/3BhWTJT via /r/plants https://ift.tt/2XTCvjI

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yaU6D4pN3Sc via /r/videos https://ift.tt/3DoSnLl

https://ift.tt/3gBLGfa via /r/TheWayWeWere https://ift.tt/3gyaXqv

I know on average these days loyalty to your employer doesn’t pay like it used to, but here’s my situation…Been with company 3 years and am well liked and somewhat essential (but of course replaceable). Boss is chill but I just took 6 weeks parental leave and I know it’s stressing him out (small workplace) me being gone so long.baby is healthy but super colicky and my wife needs help with her and we arent getting any sleep or anything else done lolalso dad just got diagnosed with stage 3 cancer and starting chemo soon so family life is a bit stressful… if i extend my parental leave i have to give 4 weeks notice so that is soonworried my boss will have a heart attack or resent me lol if i do this but i think i need to. thoughts? via /r/PersonalFinanceCanada https://ift.tt/3gzxaos

https://ift.tt/3kukEaK via /r/TheWayWeWere https://ift.tt/3jjtxor

https://ift.tt/3zmJX4S via /r/houseplants https://ift.tt/2URCv2J

https://ift.tt/3gxK8TI via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3zl1Vom

https://ift.tt/2XXpx4F via /r/TheWayWeWere https://ift.tt/3kr8zDm

https://ift.tt/2WuohVG via /r/plants https://ift.tt/3zjyjYA

https://ift.tt/2WolzRz via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3knnz52

https://ift.tt/3BcKd6S via /r/interestingasfuck https://ift.tt/3yhji8i

https://ift.tt/3gwFncG via /r/FairytaleasFuck https://ift.tt/3jfUd9p

https://ift.tt/3koo92r via /r/plantclinic https://ift.tt/3mLjxqb

https://ift.tt/3gxjcTU 9th, 2021145 Liberal MPs including PM Justin Trudeau voted against such motion (ban foreign buyer/halt money laundering in housing/increase housing supply):[MOTION TEXT – Motion No.135 – June 9th, 2021]That, given that,(i) the cost of housing continues to rise out of reach of Canadians,(ii) current government policy has failed to provide sufficient housing supply,the House call on the government to:(a) examine a temporary freeze on home purchases by non-resident foreign buyers who are squeezing Canadians out of the housing market;(b) replace the government’s failed First-Time Home Buyer Incentive with meaningful action to help first-time homebuyers;(c) strengthen law enforcement tools to halt money laundering;(d) implement tax incentives focused on increasing the supply of purpose-built market rental housing units; and(e) overhaul its housing policy to substantively increase housing supply.All MPs of CPC/NDP/Bloc/GREEN unanimously voted ‘Yes’ to support on this Housing Motion.Please share as this is the unbiased and unequivocal fact. via /r/canadahousing https://ift.tt/3sMS2NV

https://ift.tt/3muXMup via /r/pics https://ift.tt/3grRbgs

https://ift.tt/3zg9i0c via /r/BeAmazed https://ift.tt/3jh0oKA

https://ift.tt/3jcDILe via /r/plantclinic https://ift.tt/3je3IpB

https://ift.tt/2WdD9Z8 via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3DaVcQ8

https://ift.tt/38aL6k5 via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3ycnS7B

https://ift.tt/2WmEs7T via /r/Damnthatsinteresting https://ift.tt/3j87nFu

https://ift.tt/3sGkMYs via /r/OldSchoolCool https://ift.tt/3km8wbI

https://ift.tt/3jc6wDE via /r/mildlyinteresting https://ift.tt/3Ddz47G